With the continuous development of China's economy, the competition amongenterprises is also increasing. Managers of enterprises are more and more aware that theessence of internal management of enterprises is actually human management. The humanresource of an enterprise is a sign to measure the overall competitive strength of an enterprise.
The human resources of enterprises refer to the employees of enterprises. In the increasinglyfierce competition of enterprises, the employees of enterprises are the basis of thedevelopment and growth of enterprises. They are not production equipment or cost. They arethe most important enterprise resources. Therefore, as long as the employees are full ofmorale and play their potential in the work, the common progress and growth of enterprisesand employees can be realized.
Some enterprises are basically lack of attention to their employees, just doing superficialwork. They think it's the same to motivate employees. The purpose of introducinghigh-quality and highly educated talents to enterprises is to flaunt their external image andbroaden the influence of enterprises, but they only want to manage them. Some enterprisesonly pay attention to the motivation in words, but the action is still the same as before, whichleads to many employees' increasingly slack, lack of work motivation and eventuallycontinuous loss. Enterprises should pay attention to tap the potential of people, improve theincentive system, employees are active and diligent in their work, and the development ofenterprises will become more and more powerful.
The employees of the post-80s and post-90s are different from those of the past. Theirrequirements for enterprises are increasing, but their sense of belonging and loyalty toenterprises are declining; their personal characteristics are becoming stronger and stronger,but their endurance is becoming weaker and weaker. Only by constantly improving andperfecting the incentive system can the employees fully mobilize their enthusiasm andinitiative in their work, give full play to their potential, and let the enterprise move forwardalong the right track.
In this paper, through the investigation and analysis of the current situation of CYLTcompany's employee motivation, through the interview and questionnaire survey methods tocollect data, make statistics on the survey results, and use the relevant incentive theories toanalyze the problems of CYLT company's employee incentive system, and strive to rebuild aset of employee incentive system that matches the nature of the enterprise industry and itsown needs for CYLT company Department.
The innovation of this paper is to combine the five parts of salary, performance appraisal,career management, authorization mechanism and corporate culture with the guidance of employee motivation, so as to form a scientific and effective employee motivation systemwhich is suitable for their own needs. Put forward the safeguard measures for theimplementation of the improved incentive system. In the aspect of performance appraisal,combined with the actual situation of CYLT company, on the basis of performance plan, theKPI method is used to establish the appraisal plan, so that the appraisal results can be timelyand effective, and play a role in employee motivation. In terms of employee promotion,establish multi-channel promotion ladder and promotion standards, combine the personaldevelopment of employees with the development of the company, and improve the sense ofbelonging of employees to the company.
Key Words : Incentive system;Performance appraisal;Promotion。
[3]V. H. Vroom. Work and Motivation, New York: Wiley, 1964:126-230.
[4]Dernord Wine. Social Motivation, Justice, and the Moral Emotions: An Attributional Approach.London: Psychology Press, 2005
[5] 俞文釗.現代激勵理論與應用.大連:東北出版財經大學出版社,1989.
[6] 袁書杰.領導激勵.北京:研究出版社,2017.
[7] 肖祥銀.不懂員工激勵,如何做管理.北京:民主與建設出版社,2017.
[8] 王平煥. 王瑛.國外員工激勵研究的借鑒和啟示.經濟特區,2016(11):68-71.
[9]Sunil Ramlall. A Review of Employee Motivation Theories and their Implications forEmployee Retention within Organizations. The Journal of American Academy ofBusiness, 2004.
[25]Thomas W. Lee. Explaining the assigned goal-incentive interaction: The role of self-efficacy andpersonal goals. Journal of Management, 1997 (4) : 541-559.
[46]Thacker, R. A., Wayne S. An Examination of the Relationship Between Upward Influence Tacticsand Assessment of Promote Ability. Journal of Management, 1995, (21): 739-756.